<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jeff Wendorff &#187; Tutorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffwendorff.com/tag/tutorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffwendorff.com</link>
	<description>Photography ~ Workshops ~ Safaris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 20:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are you using Lightroom in 64-bit?</title>
		<link>http://jeffwendorff.com/2009/06/are-you-using-lightroom-in-64-bit/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffwendorff.com/2009/06/are-you-using-lightroom-in-64-bit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffwendorff.com/?p=642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you sure that you are running Lightroom in 64 Bit mode? Are you sure? I've recently discovered that I wasn't even though it might have looked like it!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='kouguu_fb_like_button'><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://jeffwendorff.com/2009/06/are-you-using-lightroom-in-64-bit/&#038;layout=standard&#038;show_faces=true&#038;width=450&#038;height=65&#038;action=like&#038;colorscheme=light&#038;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:65px;"></iframe></div>

<a href="http://jeffwendorff.com/wp-content/gallery/64-bit/aboutscreen.jpg" title="" rel="lightbox[singlepic71]" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-left" src="http://jeffwendorff.com/index.php?callback=image&amp;pid=71&amp;width=320&amp;height=240&amp;mode=" alt="aboutscreen" title="aboutscreen" />
</a>
I was surprised to find out that I had been running Lightroom in 32-bit mode and so even though I have a fancy computer with tons of ram and multiple cores, Lightroom was puttering along just like it did on my old 2GB core duo machine, YIKES. How did I know? It seems that Lightroom will actually tell you on the opening credits screen if it is running in 64-bit mode. When you open Lightroom the credits screen shows for a few seconds or you can bring it up manually by clicking, Lightroom&gt;About Lightroom. The screen shot at the right (click any picture to enlarge) shows Lightroom in 64-bit. If yours does not say 64 you are not utilizing your machines capabilities.
<a href="http://jeffwendorff.com/wp-content/gallery/64-bit/32bit.jpg" title="" rel="lightbox[singlepic70]" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-right" src="http://jeffwendorff.com/index.php?callback=image&amp;pid=70&amp;width=320&amp;height=240&amp;mode=" alt="32bit" title="32bit" />
</a>

<p>Lightroom on the MAC installs both 32-bit and 64-bit versions and by default activates the 32-bit version. Which is fine. (Under Windows you have to select which version to install, so you guys don&#8217;t need to read anymore.)</p>
<p>When I opened the More Info panel for Lightroom it showed that indeed that &#8220;Open in 32 bit mode&#8221; was not checked. However, the credits screen did not show that Lightroom was running in 64-bit mode! I am sure that you know how to get to the info screen via Finder&gt;Applications&gt;Adobe Lightroom. Here is another screen shot to help.</p>

<a href="http://jeffwendorff.com/wp-content/gallery/64-bit/finderview.jpg" title="" rel="lightbox[singlepic69]" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-left" src="http://jeffwendorff.com/index.php?callback=image&amp;pid=69&amp;width=320&amp;height=240&amp;mode=" alt="finderview" title="finderview" />
</a>

<p>My solution was to select &#8220;Open in 32 Bit Mode&#8221; and then open and close Lightroom. Go back and then de-select the 32-bit mode and voila, when Lightroom opened, I&#8217;ve got 64-bit!</p>
<p>I have to say it is a gigantic difference, duh! Going from 3GB of RAM to 10 is going to make a difference. I just got the MAC and so when something isn&#8217;t right, I assume user error. After my discovery I was very excited and so I called several friends. To my shock it wasn&#8217;t me, they were not in 64-bit either and they knew what they were doing. I bet a lot of you are not in 64-bit mode either.</p>
<p>After the switch, Lightroom is now turbo-charged and changes made to images in the develop module are instantaneous. This is what I was expecting with the new MAC&#8230;WOW! So check your settings to make sure that you are also in WOW mode!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffwendorff.com/2009/06/are-you-using-lightroom-in-64-bit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Star Culling</title>
		<link>http://jeffwendorff.com/2008/12/5-star-culling/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffwendorff.com/2008/12/5-star-culling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffwendorff.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is ironic that the first step in digital workflow is to actually delete most of the images that you have worked so hard to create. The images that were created with promise and passion must now be looked on without emotion or feeling and be culled, killed, deleted, zapped, smushed, axed! Such a cruel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='kouguu_fb_like_button'><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://jeffwendorff.com/2008/12/5-star-culling/&#038;layout=standard&#038;show_faces=true&#038;width=450&#038;height=65&#038;action=like&#038;colorscheme=light&#038;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:65px;"></iframe></div>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                     MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> </xml><![endif]--><!--  --><!--[if gte mso 10]> <mce:style><!   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-priority:99; 	mso-style-qformat:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0in; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:11.0pt; 	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; 	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; 	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} --> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p>It is ironic that the first step in digital workflow is to actually delete most of the images that you have worked so hard to create. The images that were created with promise and passion must now be looked on without emotion or feeling and be culled, killed, deleted, zapped, smushed, axed! Such a cruel sounding words for your dear pictures Webster&#8217;s defines culled as, &#8220;Something picked out from others, especially something rejected because of inferior quality.&#8221; See, you are doing it because of ‘inferior quality,&#8217; that should make you feel a little better.</p>
<p>Editing is the process of going to get rid of the inferior images now, not later. You don&#8217;t need them now and you&#8217;ll certainly never need them in the future, so why keep them on your hard drives? Yes, I know hard drives are cheap, but so what? Why keep inferior images when you have better ones? Software is always leaping forward and the things that we can do with images today are staggering to say the least. However, they are never going to create software that fixes focus, or composition, or subject or put chopped feet back on. Well, Ok you can sorta put feet back on, but ignore that for now, I&#8217;m on a mission. So lets get started.</p>
<p>Once your images are on your hard drive, use the browser of your choice to go through and get rid of the junk. I am currently using Lightroom and so this article is Lightroom centric, but the principles still apply. I use Lightroom because the process is so easy and simple and fast. Let&#8217;s start looking at the images and on this first pass our mission is to cull out the junk. We are not going to rate them or OOH and AHH, OK a little, but keep focused on getting rid of the bad stuff. When you see a stinker you simply hit the X key and that image is now marked for deletion. You have not deleted anything yet, but you have given notice that you intend to put that image in the trash can! Proceed through all of your images happily deleting the out of focus, legs cut off, bird flew out of the frame or otherwise obviously a waste of memory space images.</p>
<p>If you are an advanced user feel free to get rid of obvious dupes here as well. You neophytes, just get rid of the really bad ones. Now go to the grid view of the Library module and select the rejected flag. This will now show you all of the images that you just culled. Take a look at all of these images to make sure that you didn&#8217;t get falg happy and cull one too many images. If they are indeed all bad, select them all and then hit the delete key. Lightroom will ask if you want them out of the collection or deleted from the disk. You know what you have to do, deep breath&#8230;delete from disk! God job, Grasshopper. Don&#8217;t you feel better knowing those icky images are never going to show up to shame you on the internet?</p>
<p>This image shows a Lightroom screenshot.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a class="highslide" href="http://jeffwendorff.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/culling.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-477 aligncenter" title="Deleting the Images" src="http://jeffwendorff.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/culling-300x197.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="197" /></a></p>
<p>Now this is why my editing process is called 5 star culling. Some people see that they have all of these stars and colors and other hoohaws to mark their images for something. We really only need 3 stars and one of those is special. Why in the world would you want to rank one of your images as a 1 star image? To me that says it is already marked for deletion so why not get rid of it now before your emotions over rule reason and you keep the stinker. If it is a 1 star it shouldn&#8217;t be in your library. Keep your best and then the best of your best. I&#8217;m a 5 star photographer and so I only want my best, 4 stars and the best of my best, my 5 star images. You should be doing the same thing.</p>
<p>So, in this pass of reviewing images we are going to go through the images and you now have 3 options (in my system) to deal with images, rank it 3 stars, 4 stars or delete it. We&#8217;ll get to the 5 star thing in a minute. So now is when we have to be critical of our work. The first cull was easy the second is much more emotional. So look at your images, the best get 4 stars and the ones that deserve a second look get 3 stars. If it doesn&#8217;t meet those categories then it gets the X and is deleted. This is where you get rid of all of the duplicate shots. You know that 8 frame burst that captured a stationary object&#8230;yes that one, keep 1 delete 7. Mark the keeper as a 4 and move on. Also, get rid of all semi-duplicates. These are the ones where the subject eyes are closed or the head is turned or something is off. There will be times when the image is good and you are not sure about it, give these a 3 star rating. You should still only keep the best of the series from these 3 star shots. As with the round one culls, use the flag to find and then select the rejects, delete them. Now, I select all of my 4 stars and move them to my working folder. I keep a folder that are my &#8220;to be edited&#8221; images. I like to do this step as it helps me with my filing system. That is another article, stay tuned. I now move the 3 stars to a further review folder. I usually wait a week or two or even more sometimes and then come back and look at these images with fresh eyes. I then repeat the culling process on these images.</p>
<p>Now the 5 star pay off. We have now edited the images from the photo shoot and we have only processed our best shots. We have deleted the junk and are really satisfied with life. Now is when you reward yourself with that last 5th star. The 5th star is reserved for the best images in your library. Your library should never have more than about 100 5 star images at any given time. These are the 100 shots that you use to brag with friends and family, to show publishers your chops and to just enjoy after the work that you put in to making those images. After you reach 100 then when you want to nominate a new 5 star shot move a lesser image to a 4 star image. Lightroom has something called smart collections and it will automatically keep track of all images that you have rated 5 stars and with the click of a mouse all of your best are right there ready to be proud of. Hey you are a 5 star photographer now too!</p>
<p>Got a question or comment, sign in and leave it below!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffwendorff.com/2008/12/5-star-culling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	<div id="test_map" style="display:none" ></div></channel>
</rss>
